#LUFC: IIB Reveal Q2 Financial Results

Elland Road_3

IIB-Bahrian, the Bahrain based bank which owns a stake in Leeds United, have released financial results for the 6 months up to June 30th.

The bank has revealed a year-on-year increase in quarterly income, but the first six months of this year has seen a downturn in income, compared to the first six months of 2012. Net profit has also decreased to around $240,000.Just over $1,000,000 has been added to the companies total assets between December and June of this year.

So does this have any effect on Leeds? For a start, we know that IIB originally purchased 10% of LUFC after the turn of the year, paying £2.5 million. The recent ownership statement read that IIB now own more than they originally bought. This is in line with what was said in IIB’s annual report. Aabed Al-Zeera, who is a director of Leeds City Holdings and also Chief Executive at IIB, suggested that the companies shareholders would see LUFC as an “attractive investment opportunity” once GFH had solidified the football club’s financial position. Now GFH have streamlined Leeds into a more amicable financial future, investors will be more keen to buy into Leeds.

The intentions of IIB increasing their stake in Leeds United seems to be profit driven, as well as a need for diversification within the companies portfolio. This diversification is central to the bank’s strategy to reducing its credit risks. As stated in the company’s additional public disclosures document, to “avoid excessive concentrations of risk, the Bank’s policies and procedures include guidelines to maintain a diversified portfolio.” Clearly then, the bank is maintaining a stake in LUFC to help diversify against it’s competitors in Bahrain and the Middle East.

#LUFC: Mills back on Whites Radar While Major Sponsor Deal Looms

ImageIt has emerged this morning that Leeds united have made an enquiry for Bolton Wanderers central defender Matt Mills

The player is thought to be available after Boss Dougie Freedman sealed a deal for Striker Jemaine Beckford. Mills’ 25k a week contract is thought to be surplus to requirements, to try and balance the books after the Beckford deal. It remains to be seen whether Mills is the long term target that boss Brian McDermott has been tracking for weeks. An enquiry for Mills could also mean that any other deal for a defender has fallen through.

Meanwhile, news has broke today that talks have taken place between Leeds and drinks company Red Bull regarding a major sponsorship deal. It is rumoured that a stadium name change is on the cards. Red Bull would provide a significant increase in club revenue, which would have a big effect on FFP regulations. In a similar way to the likes of Manchester City and Arsenal, big sponsorship agreements mean the club can techically afford to live within their means. Any deal with Red Bull would be a first in English football, although the company actually own clubs such as the NY Red Bulls and Red Bull Salzburg. Much has been made about how Red Bull has ruined the tradition of football clubs by changing almost everything to suit the company rather than the club. It seems, however, that GFH Capital remain the dominant party in negotiations. GFHC have been looking for outside investment since aquiring Leeds to finance deals to buy back Elland Road and Thorp Arch. Red Bull have the means to support GFH Capital in any possible buy-back, with naming rights a possible wager in the deal. It seems Leeds’ owners are thinking big with the future of Leeds United. More recent sponsorships such as Bet 365 and Enterprise Insurance will not offer anywhere near the amount of exposure that Red Bull can offer, let alone the cash. Until more details emerge regarding the true nature of negotiations, it currently seems that Red Bull have no intention of wholly owning Leeds United, but rather a high value sponsorship agreement. 

LUFC: The Ken Bates Legacy Continues

It’s been a long 24 hours for Leeds United fans.

Any wild possibilities about 8 figure spending sprees were dashed when Brian McDermott revealed that it was likely he would have to create his own transfer fund. His comment enraged fans, a lot of hate has been shaped toward Salah Nooruddin, who on the night before claimed the board would back McDermott in the transfer Market. 

Brian will be backed no matter what happens with the board over the course of the summer, but you can’t help thinking that something is wrong at the very core of the football club. That core is still Ken Bates. 

Many of us have been quick to judge GFH Capital on the basis of McDermott’s comments. People have even labelled them as “worse than bates” and in my opinion that cannot be further from the truth. For a start, this season’s transfer kitty was virtually wiped out by Bates’ mortgage on season ticket sales, to pay for the East stand development. £3.5 million of all sales to be precise and current sales figures stand marginally above that. Then we go on to the massive overlays GFH have to pay. The club does not own either Thorp Arch or Elland Road, substantial rent fees have to be paid by the club simply to use them. These overlays contribute to a large cash shortfall. GFH will have been aware of these costs, but the sheer cost of running LUFC, coupled with a lack of investment from other investors, has meant GFH have struggled to keep their promises. 

It is reported that GFH in the long term want to buy back Elland Road, which seems to be a wise move considering it would reduce running costs massively. So should we blame GFH for the lack of funds? The blame should partly be shouldered by GFH but only because they still have the cancer that is Ken Bates looming over them until July 1st. Only then can we truly judge GFH and their capabilities. 

Another major talking point was that a “sell to buy” strategy MAY have to be implemented by McDermott to fund transfers. Obviously this sparked talk of Sam Byram leaving, nobody really seemed to notice that McDermott stated he “wasn’t interested” in selling his top stars. The fact that every time Bates sold a player. The funds went straight to the back pocket. We must not forget Ken Bates will hold no power from July 1st, GFH can state how they want any surplus funds to be used.

I’d also like to address a point I’ve been really interested in finding out. A lot of fans on twitter seem to say “we’ve got no money.” what did we expect from GFH? Did we expect a Man City type spend? McDermott will have a small budget to work with. Rumours stated that McDermott was promised £3million and yet some still argue that even if he did have that figure to his disposal, we still had “no money.” if you follow me on twitter, anyone who would like to answer me this question feel free: what foes the term “no money” mean to you? 

I appreciate any feedback, tweet me @jakerleedsblog 

                

GFH Capital: 6 Months In

It’s been more than 6 months since GFH Capital officially took over the Elland Road reigns. In that time, a lot has changed, some of which has been largely successful, while others have been less so.

After a grueling summer, where most Leeds fans were left frustrated at the length of the takeover negotiations, the hand over was complete on the 21st December. The process had already hindered Neil Warnock’s attempt at promotion. Ken Bates was ousted from his roll as chairman (officially on the 30th June) and a new board took shape. from then on, it looked like our new Dubai owners would splash the cash and push us back to the big time.

It now seems that much of what fans expected of GFHC never fully materialised. At the end of the day, who could be worse than Ken Bates? The bar was set high for the new owners, and even though company CEO David Haigh and Salem Patel were quick to say that they weren’t going to be spending “silly” money in January, fans were still left underwhelmed by transfer dealings, none more so than Neil Warnock. A large shortfall in cash left the owners limited to what they could offer the then Manager. Failing to capture Birmingham winger Chris Burke was thought to be because of the cash shortfall.

Then came the confusion surrounding GFHC’s future intentions. At first the parent comapany, GFH, stated that the club was for sale. GFHC then suggested that their philosophy was to create a group of like-minded investors to take the club forward. This strategy was put to practice when they announced a 10% sale of the club to a Bahrain company IIB, their founding member is now on the board at Leeds. Another 3% was sold to now vice-chairman Salah Nooruddin. After a disappointing run of results, Neil Warnock was relieved of his duties, and Brian McDermott took over the reigns a couple of weeks later.

So, have there been many good points about the takeover so far? For a start, prices for season tickets, matchday programmes and other things have decreased substantially, which is a refreshing change from the Bates era. Student prices have been introduced, and the whole system of buying the actual ST has been reworked. Hospitality has also been refreshed. Most of the current ST holder have renewed, and more have since bought them, making the numbers climb above 11,000. Averaging all of the prices in each section of the stadium, sales figures so far will be around the £4.2 million mark. A large chunk of that will be used to pay back a loan on the East Stand development.

Another positive point not noticed by the majority so far this summer, is transfers. Under Bates and Warnock, the club brought in many new faces, most of which were above the age of 30, and most had an air of pit worker rather than brazilian samba dancer. What we have been linked with so far, whether it be free agent or under contract, has been much more exciting. Players like Tommy Rowe, Reece Wabara, Matt Smith (signed), David Wotherspoon and Matt Mills are of a higher class than those signed last season. Fans may moan that £3million signings aren’t being made, or lower league players simply aren’t good enough for us, but we have to remember that GFHC employed Brian McDermott for a reason. Not only is he a good manager, he also has a good eye for players who have the potential to succeed. They are hungry, determined to better themselves. The transfer policy has been changed completely by GFHC and McDermott, and there certainly won’t be any Journeymen singed by McDermott this summer.

The question looming over us however, is the age-old question.Do GFHC have the funds to succeed? This forms part of one of the negative points surrounding GFHC. A lot of fans have been voicing their despair at the apparent lack of funds our owners have. Nobody truly knows the financial situation, except the owners themselves, and Brian McDermott. From rumours gathered so far, a lot of people believe we will only sign free transfers this summer, and we “can’t even afford Tommy Rowe.” The lack of communication between board room and fan base is partly to blame for this. An open board could certainly dampen wild expectations, but it can also make us more realistic to what we can look forward to. The recent story about Barry Fry’s comments regarding an approach for Peterborough captain Tommy Rowe has enraged fans, only because his comments have been taken out of context by the media. Fry said that Leeds would not be able to afford him, in reference to his own valuation of the player. Speaking to Radio Leeds, Fry said he had “no idea” about the financial situation at Elland Road. This should have been the end of it, but unfortunately when something gets out of hand, it snowballs. A statement from the club, or even a quick chat with Brian McDermott would have sufficed. I suspect the next time McDermott is on the radio or on LUTV, he will be quick to tell us all straight about the situation.

We will all have to wait and see about what the summer will bring for out great club, but overall we can be satisfied that the right Man is in the job, Brian McDermott.

LUFC: McDermott Comments fuel Wabara Speculation

Leeds United manager Brian McDermott has fuelled more speculation surrounding summer transfer recruitment.

Speaking to LUTV, McDermott suggested that he is looking at the free agent market, players who will demand a transfer fee and also players who are running into the last year of their contract, “under the age of 24.”

This comment has ignited speculation that appeared last week on twitter, that Manchester City defender Reece Wabara is on Leeds’ radar. The 21 year old is highly regarded among the City elite, but has rarely featured for the club, although he has been loaned to Oldham Athletic and Blackpool this season. Being 21, he fits into the category McDermott is suggesting. He signed a 3-year deal with the blues in 2011, which means he is going into the last year of his contract. Leeds would have to pay that off to secure his services. His salary at City is not thought to be astronomical (around £10,000 a week) so Leeds could easily cater for his salary demands. The defensive positions are in need of bolstering this summer, and Wabara can play in various positions including right-back and in the centre of the defense. Young, hungry players are just what Leeds need to target this summer, and if the indications are correct, Wabara could become the first of a transfer influx.

Keep following me on twitter, @jakerleedsblog

Image

LUFC: Naming the Leeds United backers is almost impossible

GFH have been constantly scrutinised on their apparent lack of funds available to Leeds United this summer. Although their accounts give little away, there is a snippet of information that adds further complexity into the situation.

Inside the 2012 Gulf Finance House financial report, there is, as there is in all other financial reports, details of shares held by individuals. There are thousands of shares held by different people, but only two people (or entities) own more than 5% and less than 10% of the company, Gulf Finance House.

The largest shareholder is Mr. Yousuf Janahi, the Chairman of GFH. The second shareholder is, however, much more interesting. Approximately 5.3% of GFH is owned by a separate entity, the Al Muthanna Investment Co. The report states that this is the “Clients Accounts.” If we dig into this further, Al Muthanna is a 100% subsidiary of Kuwait Finance House. So this is a similar setup to how GFH Capital are the owners of LUFC. So what does this mean for Leeds? George Dyer, a Leeds fan and well known to fans for analysing Leeds United’s financial accounts on his blog, helped me out on this one:

“If something is stated as client accounts of a company then that means that it is ring fenced from the main company. Typically an investment firm will raise money from clients for a fund and then invest that on their behalf into investments. Therefore whilst Al Muthanna might be 100% owned by KFH, it doesn't mean that it is KFH's money invested into GFH.”

 

This means that the clients to which GFH deal with are separate to GFH’s accounts. This means we may never be able to tell who exactly backed the buyout of LUFC. We don’t know how much money is available to GFH for us this summer, because the clients’ accounts and identities are (understandably) private. This is, of course, an inconvenience for us fans, but this is the way that firms like this work. The Bahraini Royal Family is thought to be closely linked to GFH, so this could potentially be one source of the backing.

With thanks to George Dyer, keep in touch with his blog via @Ole1985 on twitter, and you can follow me on twitter, @jakerleedsblog 

Image

Leeds United Breaking News: Vaughan close to Huddersfield Switch

Norwich Striker James Vaughan is close to securing a permanent switch to Huddersfield Town. Vaughan, who has had an excellent season on loan at the John Smiths stadium, has attracted interest from a number of championship clubs, including Leeds. Boss Brian McDermott has looked at the striker and it was suggested to me that the striker was a target for Leeds if other deals fell through. Billy Sharp is thought to be in talks with Leeds about a move to Elland Road, and if this transfer is completed, McDermott will not look to the Norwich City forward.

LUFC: Interest Mounts in Sharp

Speculation has strongly linked Southampton striker Billy Sharp to an Elland Road move. The player, who has 2 years left on his current contract, is thought to be interested in a move to Leeds, and it is even speculated that Southampton and Leeds are close to agreeing a fee around £1.25 million. A transfer of this calibre would be seen as a signal of intent from united’s owners GFH Capital, and it would certainly renew confidence into a largely expectant fan base. Sharp himself is proven as a goal scorer in both premier league and championship level. He has been linked to Leeds in the past when Sharp was plying his trade at Scunthorpe.

It is still questionable whether Leeds can fit him into a budget that will most likely be one of small proportions. Sharp would cost a significant chunk anyone’s budget, but owners GFH Capital may be hard pressed to secure his services.

Follow me on twitter, @jakerleedsblog

Leeds United: New Investment draws Near

It was revealed yesterday in Bahrain that GFH Capital have performed due diligence on a number of companies, with the potential to become strategic investors in Leeds United.

 Talking to Gulf Daily News, acting CEO Hisham Al Rayes revealed the plans while GFH released its Q1 profits, which were up 50% from 2012. The news falls when the club are turning attentions to the summer transfer window, plenty of additions are expected to be made.

 Recent speculation has surfaced surrounding a majority stake being sold to local businessman Steve Parkin, but it is now understood that any previous agreement with GFH has now passed, and his wealthy backer has now pulled out. Parkin himself does not have the finances to buy a majority stake and provide the necessary financial injections.

 It is still uncertain however, that GFH Capital remains committed long term to the football club. The statement released does suggest that they may relinquish a majority stake in the football club. Investment seems likely to happen before the transfer window opens, which is good news for new Manager Brian McDermott, who is looking to add at least 7 players to the squad in the coming months. In the past few years there has been little to no investment into the playing squad, and it is still unclear whether this will change, but there is hope that new investment could bring in the money required to finance a summer spend.

Image

 

Keep following me on twitter, @jakerleedsblog

MATCH REPORT: Crazy game at Elland Road sees Leeds lose out

It was the last game this season at Elland Road, with Brighton looking to cement their place in the Championship play-off spots, while Leeds were firmly looking to next season.

The day started off brilliantly for the whites, with Sam Byram suffering a knock in the warm up, which forced Brian McDermott’s hand. He was replaced by Lee Peltier, while Ryan Hall was promoted to the bench.

the game started off on a sour note for Leeds, when Tom Lees made a mess of a clearance, only for Will Buckley to hit home a simple finish from close range. Things got even worse for the whites when Rudy Austin was sent off for an off ball incident. This morning Leeds have appealed the decision. The half was finished strongly by the whites with a host of penalty shouts, but even though a rejuvenated Leeds played with more fluency and drive, they still could not find an equaliser before the break.

The second half was more of the same, with plenty of opportunities falling to Ross McCormack and Luke Varney. later in the half Diouf was felled in the box, and the referee levelled things up by showing the Brighton defender a straight red card, and a penalty. Diouf coolly slotted the penalty in, and seemingly, the game was back on.

Bizarrely, Diouf was then sent off moments later, for making obscene gestures to the Brighton away contingent. personally, what he did was wrong, but I’ve never heard of a player being shown a straight red card after celebrating. It seems a little unfair, but McDermott hasn’t appealed. Late in the game Leeds conceded a goal to Brighton after good play by Andrea Orlandi. The result didn’t reflect the performance and determination shown by Leeds, and it was a disappointing result to cap off a disappointing season at Elland Road.

 

Keep following me on twitter, @jakerleedsblog

Image